Make the AI decisions your organisation can execute.
In one day, from differing assessments to three defensible AI bets, three deliberate stops and a 90-day cadence.
Thirty minutes with a founder. Then you get scope and a fixed price.
- CEO, COO, CFO, CIO
- Executive team
- Board members
- Owners with operational responsibility
- Portfolio leads pre-invest, post-invest or pre-exit
The starting point
The board discusses tools while the organisation struggles with data, accountability and a shared picture of reality. AI isn't missing from the agenda. It just rarely arrives in a state you can decide on.
In the AI Monitor, leadership rates AI readiness at 54 out of 100. People doing the daily work say 42. Plan on the higher number and you may be funding an organisation that doesn't exist.
Dream outcome
The group knows where AI can create strategic value, what deliberately won't be funded, who decides and how progress will be visible in 90 days.
Your first result
Leadership-vs-organisation gap map
Within five working days of a complete intake, the group receives a gap map with the three questions that most need answering on the decision day.
How closely does your read match the organisation's?
Three questions on readiness, strategy and daily practice. Your result appears immediately – no email, no form.
Leadership Gap Snapshot
- 01
Our organisation is ready to put AI to productive use.
not at all50completely - 02
We have an AI strategy with budget, accountability and a clear plan.
not at all50completely - 03
I know which AI tools our people actually work with.
not at all50completely
Basis: 162 valid responses, 106 of them with demographic detail. AI Monitor 2026, published by Teklens with ETH Zurich and the University of St. Gallen. Self-assessments, normalised to 0–100. Pre-release.
What the Decision Lab includes
Every component names the obstacle it removes, the artefact you receive and when it is delivered.
No prior AI knowledge required.
- Obstacle
Differing assessments and fuzzy terminology
ArtefactBenchmark, perception gaps and starting position
Deliveredbefore the decision day
- Obstacle
Discussion without a decision
ArtefactA facilitated one-day decision process
Deliveredworkshop day
- Obstacle
Use cases get prioritised by volume rather than value
ArtefactPortfolio by strategic value, uncertainty, time-to-value, defensibility, readiness and risk
Deliveredworkshop day
- Obstacle
Insights can't be budgeted or delegated
Artefact3 bets, 3 stops or waits, owners, metrics and a 90-day milestone
Deliveredwithin five working days of the workshop
- Obstacle
Unclear decision rights
ArtefactBoard, executive and functional accountability
Deliveredwith the Decision Pack
- Obstacle
Decisions and evidence disappear into presentations
ArtefactA versioned workspace for strategy, governance, portfolio and reviews
Deliveredwith the Decision Pack
Included accelerators
- Build · Buy · Partner · Wait · Stop scorecard
- Vendor and model risk checklist
- 90-day board review agenda
- Decision log template
Templates created during the lab that your team keeps using afterwards. We don't attach invented individual values to them.
When the evidence holds: Execution Track
90-Day AI Leadership Operating System
The Decision Lab plus 90 days in which the three bets become real operating moves.
- Translating the three bets into real operating moves
- Three agreed executive reviews
- Sharpening metrics, budget and ownership
- Vendor and partner decisions, where in scope
- Updated Context Workspace
- Closing review with a continue, change or stop decision
Proof
Problem proof
- 54 vs 42
Leadership rates AI readiness higher than the people doing the daily work.
Basis: 162 valid responses, 106 of them with demographic detailLimitation: Self-assessments, normalised to 0–100. The gap shows a difference in perception, not which side is right. - 28%
of organisations have the CEO directly accountable for AI governance. That single factor shows the strongest link to measurable bottom-line impact.
Source: McKinsey, «The State of AI» (2025)Basis: Global enterprise survey, self-reported governance and impactLimitation: Correlation, not causation. CEO accountability does not create the effect; it accompanies it. - 2 Aug 2026
Since that date the Article 50 transparency obligations, general-purpose AI enforcement and the full penalty regime apply.
Source: EU AI Act, Umsetzungsstand (2026)Basis: Legal text and the published implementation timelineLimitation: The high-risk deadlines moved to December 2027 and August 2028 respectively. Not legal advice.
ETH Zurich and the University of St. Gallen are research partners on the AI Monitor. They are not Teklens reference customers.
Mechanism proof
Anonymised example · Swiss industrial company, around 400 employees
| Decision | Type | Owner | Metric | 90 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-assisted quotation drafting | Bet | COO | Quote turnaround time | Pilot in two regions |
| Knowledge search across product docs | Bet | CIO | Search time per query | Rollout to support |
| Restart predictive maintenance | Wait | CTO | Sensor data coverage | Review after the data project |
| Train an in-house language model | Stop | CTO | — | Not pursued, reasons in the log |
Delivery proof
What we have actually delivered: cases, customer quotes or an anonymised before-and-after. Where nothing is cleared yet we show a clearly labelled anonymised example – not an empty placeholder.
We do · You provide
We do
- Benchmark and analysis
- Interview and document synthesis
- Preparing the decisions
- Facilitation and Decision Pack
- Workspace structure and review cadence
You provide
- 15 minutes of intake per person
- Relevant strategy and portfolio documents
- One day with the group that can actually decide
- Named owners for the agreed bets
Investment
Two options, one scope. The Execution Track sits first because it shows the full extent – the recommended entry is the Decision Lab.
1-Day AI Board Decision Lab
Diagnosis, a shared decision and a concrete execution plan. For teams that need clarity before they commit capital or capacity.
- Role-specific diagnosis
- First-value snapshot
- One to two workshop days
- Decision Pack
- Context Workspace
- 90- or 100-day plan
- First result
- 5 working days after a complete intake
- Full result
- 5 working days after the decision day
- Effort on your side
- 15 minutes per person plus one day with the group
The scope is set; the price is fixed in the scoping call and confirmed in writing. No line items appearing later.
When the agreed inputs are complete, we deliver the defined Decision Pack by the agreed date. If an agreed component is missing, we keep working at no extra fee until the pack is complete.
The group knows where AI can create strategic value, what deliberately won't be funded, who decides and how progress will be visible in 90 days.
Review the Board Decision Lab90-Day AI Leadership Operating System
The Decision Lab plus real execution, reviews and embedding into how the team works.
- Everything in the Decision Lab
- Execution on the real portfolio, backlog or GTM system
- Agreed working assets or agents
- Quality and governance gates
- Review cadence
- Handover and ongoing development in the Context Workspace
- First result
- 5 working days after a complete intake
- Full result
- 5 working days after the decision day
- Effort on your side
- 15 minutes per person plus one day with the group
The scope is set; the price is fixed in the scoping call and confirmed in writing. No line items appearing later.
When the agreed inputs are complete, we deliver the defined Decision Pack by the agreed date. If an agreed component is missing, we keep working at no extra fee until the pack is complete.
The group knows where AI can create strategic value, what deliberately won't be funded, who decides and how progress will be visible in 90 days.
Review the Board Decision LabA decision you can act on – or we keep working.
When the agreed inputs are complete, we deliver the defined Decision Pack by the agreed date. If an agreed component is missing, we keep working at no extra fee until the pack is complete.
We guarantee defined outputs and dates that we control. No revenue, transformation or autonomy guarantee – that depends on your execution, and we can't stand behind it.
- a validated baseline
- prioritised decisions
- reasoned wait and stop decisions
- named owners
- success criteria or metrics
- a roadmap and the next review point
- an updated Context Workspace
- Complete inputs by the agreed date
- The agreed stakeholders take part
- Decisions stay within the agreed scope
- Access and permissions are in place
- No external blocker prevents the work
Fit gate
After Decode and Shape, you decide – not us.
The Execution Track does not start automatically. A reasoned wait or stop is a valid result – and often the most valuable one.
- Amplify
The evidence holds. We start the Execution Track.
- Experiment
A bounded test resolves the open uncertainty before capacity is committed.
- Wait
Fix the groundwork or the input first. With a criterion and a review date, not as a postponement.
- Stop
No sensible business case. Recording that with reasons saves more than any pilot.
Decode → Shape → Amplify → Evolve.
A loop, not a transformation with an end date.
- 01
Decode
Understand reality, context and the bottleneck
Where do we actually stand?
- 02
Shape
Set decisions, priorities and limits
What do we change – and what don't we?
- 03
Amplify
Turn decisions into real work
How does measurable impact happen?
- 04
Evolve
Embed learning, governance and routine
How does the system get better?
The Decision Lab covers Decode and Shape and hands over to Amplify and Evolve. The Execution Track runs the whole loop.
Your company leaves with a system, not a slide deck.
Every lab leaves behind a versioned Context Workspace: evidence, decisions, work, rules and what you learned, in one place. Human-readable, machine-readable for approved agents, exportable.
- Versioned, with traceable sources and assumptions
- An owner per artefact; decisions dated and reasoned
- Human-readable and machine-readable for approved agents
- Exportable – no artificial lock-in
- Permissions and data residency settled, update rhythm defined in Evolve
/company-ai/
00_evidence/
01_strategy/
02_governance/
03_portfolio/
04_reviews/Common questions
Not sure which Lab fits?
Thirty minutes with the founding team. You get a clear recommendation, the right scope – or a reasoned no.