Prioritise opportunities
Rank competing opportunities by strategic fit, customer value, evidence, effort and risk, with effort grounded in the real code rather than gut feeling.
Product statusAvailable now
Why it matters
RICE, ICE, MoSCoW and Kano are methods inside this Activity, not separate Activities. What Teklens adds is the effort and risk side of every score: read from the code, with the dependencies named.
Owner
Product Manager
Human-led
Participants · Agents
Trigger
A roadmap or planning cycle, or material new opportunities.
Required context
Optional context
Skills
Methods used inside this Activity: RICE · ICE · MoSCoW · Kano · Weighted scoring · Impact × feasibility matrix · Strategic objective alignment · JTBD prioritisation
Activity steps
- 1Filter the candidates against the objectives.
- 2Choose the scoring method that fits the decision.
- 3Score consistently, with effort and risk read from the code.
- 4Challenge the assumptions and rank.
- 5Record the rationale and update the roadmap.
Output
Ranked opportunity list with decision rationale.
Artifacts
Updates: Roadmap, Product Brain
What good looks like
- The method fits the decision.
- Evidence and assumptions are visible.
- Effort comes from the code, not from memory.
- Strategic exceptions are documented.
Quality gate
Destination
Usually next
Method references: Intercom, RICE · Kano model · Ulwick, Jobs-to-be-Done
Deep dives from the AI PM Lab
Articles that explain the thinking behind this Activity.
Show us exactly how product work happens today.
Thirty minutes with a founder. We compare your process with the Playbook and pick the first Activity to run on your Jira and your repo.